Social Science Research Council Research AMP Mediawell
 
 
Essay

Data: the New Cotton

Chaz Arnett
May 25, 2022
Essay

Data: the New Cotton

Chaz Arnett
May 25, 2022

One could imagine that in 1853, Henrietta Wood had only recently begun acclimating to life as a “free” Black woman living in Cincinnati (McDaniel 2019, 11-14). Wood, who was formerly enslaved, was brought to the free state of Ohio from New Orleans nearly a decade earlier by Jane Cirode, one of her previous enslavers (McDaniel 2019, 14, 16). However, Cirode’s daughter and son-in-law took umbrage with Wood’s newfound freedom and sought to recapture her value (McDaniel 2019, 13). They hired a deputy sheriff from Kentucky, Zebulon Ward, to kidnap Wood and sell her back into slavery (McDaniel 2019, 13). After an elaborate scheme to get Wood to cross over to the Kentucky side of the Ohio River, with the help of her employer, Wood was captured and ultimately taken to Natchez, Mississippi, where she was sold to the son of a former governor (McDaniel 2019, 3, 102).

It would be many years before Wood would taste freedom again, finally being freed in Texas several years after both the Emancipation Proclamation and the end of the Civil War (McDaniel 2019, 144–46, 159, 165–68). While the tragedy of Wood’s story was far too common,[1]See Solomon Northrop, Twelve Years a Slave (New York: Penguin Classics, 2012); Carol Wilson, Freedom at Risk: The Kidnapping of Free Blacks in America, 1780–1865 (Lexington: University Press … Continue reading it is unique in the legal battle that came after. In 1870, Wood sued Ward in federal court, seeking $20,000 in restitution (McDaniel 2019, 199). After years of litigation, she finally won her case. While the jury would award her just $2,500, it was one of the first and only awards of its size for restitution for slavery (McDaniel 2019, 4).

The value that Henrietta Wood attached to her additional years in bondage, the equivalent of nearly $450,000 in 2022 dollars, reflects an intimate understanding of the monies reaped through the exploitation of Black flesh. No one knew more than those who were enslaved—and had families torn apart through sales—the capital interests and values placed upon their bodies. In fact, in many of the recorded and documented accounts of those formerly enslaved are memories of knowing what price was fetched by the sale of family or the sale of themselves, and many such accounts quote the going rate (McDaniel 2019, 27). At no point was that value higher than after the outlawing of the external slave trade to the United States, where between 1807 and 1808, over one million African Americans were moved from the Upper to the Lower South (Smith 2021, 3).

The US seems poised to make another transformative economic move, again through forced extraction from racial minorities, but now with data as the prized commodity instead of cotton.

At the heart of this movement was the production of cotton (Baptist 2016, 23). Cotton was the world’s most widely traded commodity at the time (Baptist 2016, 23). Beginning in the late 1700s, the cotton boom helped transform the US from a small European trading partner and outpost to one of the world’s largest economies (Baptist 2016, 20). Cotton monopoly profits powered the modernization of the US economy and ushered in large-scale industrialization, all but ensuring the entrenchment of the country as a slavocracy (Hannah-Jones 2021, 18-19). Today, the US seems poised to make another transformative economic move, again through forced extraction from racial minorities, but now with data as the prized commodity instead of cotton. 

For many years, particularly at the beginning of the twentieth century when historians rewrote the history of US enslavement, the profit motive of racial domination and oppression was downplayed and outright dismissed (Baptist 2016, 18). Yet, recognizing the relationship between race and capital, and the impact of that relationship on the rise of modern capitalism, is at the heart of the theory of racial capitalism. Racial capitalism is the process by which capital accumulation is built from the creation and leveraging of racial difference (Jenkins and Leroy 2021, 3-4). This purported difference is further used to justify and naturalize the inequality necessary for the disparate distribution of resources, power, and rights (Jenkins and Leroy 2021, 3-4). Thus, racial capitalism can be viewed as a frame for understanding, historically and currently, how capitalism operates.

Racial capitalism as a framework can help us to understand the emerging world of surveillance capitalism. In her book In the Age of Surveillance Capitalism, Shoshana Zuboff argues that tech companies have turned to the commodification of data emittance and exhaust in a new kind of marketplace for behavioral predictions (Zuboff 2019, 8-9). She equates what companies like Google, Facebook, and Amazon do to what companies like Ford Motors, and auto manufacturing more broadly, did to shape how capitalism operates (Zuboff 2019, 85-88). This new marketing potential of data has led many people to refer to data as the new oil or the new gold, given increasing efforts to mine, capture, and commodify it.[2]See “The World’s Most Valuable Resource Is No Longer Oil, But Data,” The Economist, May 6, 2017; Joris Toonders, “Data Is the New Oil of the Digital Economy,” Wired, July 2014; Kiran … Continue reading Yet, Zuboff views surveillance capitalism as “parasitic,” feeding on the human experience and exploiting digital connection for commercial ends in ways that disregard important social norms, undermine individual autonomy, and threaten a democratic society (Zuboff 2019, 9-11).

Photo by ev

Despite its central focus on exploitation, much of the literature that has developed on surveillance capitalism has failed to wrestle with and examine how race works within and through surveillance capitalism. More recent scholarship has shown, however, that “racial subjugation is not a special application of capitalist processes, but rather central to how capitalism operates,” even within emerging structures of data marketing.[3]Jenkins and Leroy, Histories of Racial Capitalism, vii. For scholarship examining race and surveillance capitalism, see Brian Jefferson, Digitize and Punish: Racial Criminalization in the … Continue reading Connecting the production and exploitation of racial difference to monetary extraction and profit accumulation, rather than individual biases, is critical to adequately see, understand, respond to, and ultimately dismantle surveillance capitalism. It is not an ancillary focus or concern—it is central. Thus, it may be more apt to think of data as the new cotton, not only because of the uniquely transformative role cotton played in grounding and catapulting the American economy, but also because the racial connections evoked by cotton forces us to see the real source of exploited value beyond the commodity itself, as the cotton empire was powered by stolen labor off of the scarred backs of millions of enslaved Africans.[4]I recognize the role that race has also played in the pursuit of oil and gold, through the extermination of racialized Indigenous peoples and occupation of Native lands. Indeed, from the late 18th century through the mid-19th century, enslaved bodies were America’s largest financial asset, valued at nearly double the yearly national income for the entire United States. Using this lens elevates and centers views from the margins, in ways that reveal how surveillance capitalism acts to reproduce, harness, and entrench racially exploitative processes and systems.

As a criminal law scholar and former public defender, I have been interested in how these practices take form in criminal laws, policies, and institutions. Through my work, I have observed that racial capitalism logics play a significant role in deepening carcerality and criminalization in at least three ways. First, racial capitalism is manifest in criminal data enterprising in instances where Black bodies are exploited as sources for extracting raw data. Take, for example, voice recognition companies that have turned to prisons, where there are disproportionate numbers of Black people, to use inmate phone calls in developing and testing voice prints (Joseph and Nathan 2019). Second, racial capitalism can be seen in commercial practices that target Black communities as locations to experiment with new surveillance technology. For example, one of the first attempted residential uses of facial recognition technology in New York City was at a majority-Black apartment complex in Brooklyn[5]See Mutale Nkonde, “Automated Anti-Blackness: Facial Recognition in Brooklyn, New York,” Harvard Kennedy School Journal of African American Policy 2019–20 (2020): 30–36; Erin Durkin, “New … Continue reading. Third, racial capitalism is at work when myths of Black inherent criminality are proffered as justification for the development and deployment of police and correctional surveillance technology.[6]See Chaz Arnett, “Race, Surveillance, Resistance,” Ohio State Law Journal 81, no. 6 (2020): 1103–42; Amba Kak and Rashida Richardson, “Suspect Development Systems: Databasing Marginality … Continue reading For example, the widespread use of electronic ankle monitors[7]See Chaz Arnett, “From Decarceration to E-carceration,” Cardozo Law Review 41, no. 2 (2019): 673 and police aerial surveillance[8]See Arnett, “Race, Surveillance,Resistance.” has been achieved through technology companies pitching their strategies as necessary to ensure public safety in “high-crime urban areas.” Such language acts as a code to signal Black neighborhoods.

The proliferation of digitized monitoring and tracking constrains freedom of movement, impinges on rights to organize and civically engage, limits liberties in a form of second-tier citizenship, and contributes to a social marginalization that restricts Black people to the outskirts of the US polity. 

These surveillance practices not only take advantage of the legacies of racial subordination to control vulnerable communities and reap profits but actively maintain racial hierarchies (Arnett 2020). The proliferation of digitized monitoring and tracking constrains freedom of movement, impinges on rights to organize and civically engage, limits liberties in a form of second-tier citizenship, and contributes to a social marginalization that restricts Black people to the outskirts of the US polity (Arnett 2019). The sad irony is that this continued hypersurveillance has always sought to render the humanity of Black lives invisible.[9]See Chaz Arnett, Black Lives Monitored (forthcoming 2022).  From the moment that they walk out of their homes, Black people are inundated with high-tech modes of watching like crime camera networks.[10]See Gracie Todd, “Police Cameras Disproportionately Surveil Nonwhite Areas of DC and Baltimore, CNS Finds,” Capital News Service, November 19, 2020; Amnesty International, “Inside the … Continue reading If they choose to drive they are disparately targeted by traffic cameras (Hopkins and Sanchez 2022). If they are using cell phones they are more likely to be the targets of police stingray technology (Joseph 2016), and their use of social media to organize against racial injustice and express themselves is more likely to be the focus of police surveillance (Arnett 2022). Yet, when this hypervisibility leads Black people to being subject to police violence, justice is denied and they are portrayed as less than human[11]See Phillip Atiba Goff, Jennifer L. Eberhardt, Melissa J. Williams, and Matthew Christian Jackson, “Not Yet Human: Implicit Knowledge, Historical Dehumanization, and Contemporary Consequences,” … Continue reading. If they are minors, they are not seen as children nor given the benefit of youthful innocence.[12]See Kristin Henning, The Rage of Innocence: How America Criminalizes Black Youth (New York: Pantheon, 2021); Rebecca Stone and Kelly M. Socia, “Boy with Toy or Black Male with Gun: An Analysis of … Continue reading When complaints about efforts to police “white spaces” [13]SeeAngela Onwuachi-Willig, “Policing the Boundaries of Whiteness: The Tragedy of Being out of Place from Emmett Till to Trayvon Martin,” Iowa Law Review 102, no. 3 (2017): 1151; Elijah … Continue reading are levied by those seeking to live normal lives,[14]See Taja-Nia Y. Henderson and Jamila Jefferson-Jones, “#LivingWhileBlack: Blackness as Nuisance,” American University Law Review 69, no. 3 (2020): 863–914. such complaints are dismissed as racist themselves. Finally, petitions to take reparative action for years of race-based discrimination and inequities are portrayed as unworkable, narrow claims that come at the expense of helping all Americans.[15]See Juliet Hooker, “Black Lives Matter and the Paradoxes of US Black Politics: From Democratic Sacrifice to Democratic Repair,” Political Theory 44, no. 4 (2016): 448–69; Jasson Perez, … Continue reading Thus, the burden that Black people carry is one of being constantly monitored while remaining unseen and unheard.

Before Zebulon Ward died as a very wealthy man, he signed the restitution check to Henrietta Wood with a mocking note indicating that it was “to pay for the last Negro that will ever be paid for in this country” (McDaniel 2019, 232). Although Ward’s sardonic words still haunt today, Wood may have had the last laugh. Her efforts not only set a precedent but also spawned a formidable legacy.[16]Wood’s son, Arthur H. Simms, who was also born during enslavement, became a prominent attorney in Chicago and practiced well into his nineties. Likely inspired by his mother’s legal battles, … Continue reading Yet, as we head further into an era of increasing attempts to digitally extract capital on the backs of people that look like Wood, we must wrestle with the plantation logics inherent in exploitative data practices, if we are to ever achieve anything resembling justice in technology.

Footnotes

References
1 See Solomon Northrop, Twelve Years a Slave (New York: Penguin Classics, 2012); Carol Wilson, Freedom at Risk: The Kidnapping of Free Blacks in America1780–1865 (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1994); Paul Finkelman, “The Kidnapping of John Davis and the Adoption of the Fugitive Slave Law of 1793,” Journal of Southern History 56, no. 3 (1990): 397–422; Peter P. Hinks, “‘Frequently Plunged Into Slavery’: Free Blacks and Kidnapping in Antebellum Boston,” Historical Journal of Massachusetts 20, no. 1 (1992): 16–31.
2 See “The World’s Most Valuable Resource Is No Longer Oil, But Data,” The Economist, May 6, 2017; Joris Toonders, “Data Is the New Oil of the Digital Economy,” Wired, July 2014; Kiran Bhageshpur, “Data Is the New Oil—and That’s a Good Thing,” Forbes, November 15, 2019; Khofiz Shakhidi, “Information Is the New Gold,” Forbes, June 18, 2020; David Doty, “Data Is Gold for Publishers in a New Media World Order,” Forbes, July 29, 2021; Forbes Africa, “Data Is the New Gold,” Forbes Africa, 2020; Arvind Singh, “Is Big Data the New Black Gold?,” Wired, February 2013; Bernard Moon, “Cultivated Data Is the Next Gold Rush,” Tech Crunch, August 8, 2019
3 Jenkins and Leroy, Histories of Racial Capitalism, vii. For scholarship examining race and surveillance capitalism, see Brian Jefferson, Digitize and Punish: Racial Criminalization in the Digital Age (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2020), 3–7; Nicholas Mirzoeff, “Artificial Vision, White Space and Racial Surveillance Capitalism,” AI & Society36 (2021): 1295–1305; Yvonne Jooste, “Surveillance Capitalism as White World-Making,” Acta Academia 53, no. 1 (2021): 44–67; Gary Kafer, “Surveillance Capitalism and Its Racial Discontents,” Jump Cut, n.d.
4 I recognize the role that race has also played in the pursuit of oil and gold, through the extermination of racialized Indigenous peoples and occupation of Native lands.
5 See Mutale Nkonde, “Automated Anti-Blackness: Facial Recognition in Brooklyn, New York,” Harvard Kennedy School Journal of African American Policy 2019–20 (2020): 30–36; Erin Durkin, “New York Tenants Fight as Landlords Embrace Facial Recognition Cameras,” The Guardian, May 29, 2019, https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2019/may/29/new-york-facial-recognition-cameras-apartment-complex; J. Khadijah Abdurahman, “Organizing as Joy: An Ocean-Hill Brownsville Story, with Tranae Moran and Fabian Rogers,” Logic, December 25, 2021, https://logicmag.io/beacons/organizing-as-joy-an-ocean-hill-brownsville-story-with-tranae-moran-and/.
6 See Chaz Arnett, “Race, SurveillanceResistance,” Ohio State Law Journal 81, no. 6 (2020): 1103–42; Amba Kak and Rashida Richardson, “Suspect Development Systems: Databasing Marginality and Enforcing Discipline,” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 55, no. 3 (Forthcoming 2022 – currently at SSRN)
7 See Chaz Arnett, “From Decarceration to E-carceration,” Cardozo Law Review 41, no. 2 (2019): 673
8 See Arnett, “Race, Surveillance,Resistance.”
9 See Chaz Arnett, Black Lives Monitored (forthcoming 2022). 
10 See Gracie Todd, “Police Cameras Disproportionately Surveil Nonwhite Areas of DC and Baltimore, CNS Finds,” Capital News Service, November 19, 2020; Amnesty International, “Inside the NYPD’s Surveillance Machine”
11 See Phillip Atiba Goff, Jennifer L. Eberhardt, Melissa J. Williams, and Matthew Christian Jackson, “Not Yet Human: Implicit Knowledge, Historical Dehumanization, and Contemporary Consequences,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94, no. 2 (2008): 292–306; CalvinJohn Smiley and David Fakunle, “From ‘Brute’ to ‘Thug’: The Demonization and Criminalization of Unarmed Black Male Victims in America,” Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 26, no. 3–4 (2016): 350–66.
12 See Kristin Henning, The Rage of Innocence: How America Criminalizes Black Youth (New York: Pantheon, 2021); Rebecca Stone and Kelly M. Socia, “Boy with Toy or Black Male with Gun: An Analysis of Online News Articles Covering the Shooting of Tamir Rice,” Race and Justice 9, no. 3 (2017): 330–58; Kristin Dukes and Sarah E. Gaither, “Young, Black, and Endangered: Examining the Deaths of Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, and Tamir Rice through a Psychological Lens,” in Stereotypes and Stereotyping: Misperceptions, Perspectives and Role of Social Media, ed. Claude Fields, 87 (New York: Nova Science, 2016).
13 SeeAngela Onwuachi-Willig, “Policing the Boundaries of Whiteness: The Tragedy of Being out of Place from Emmett Till to Trayvon Martin,” Iowa Law Review 102, no. 3 (2017): 1151; Elijah Anderson, “The White Space,” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 1, no. 1 (2015): 10 –21.
14 See Taja-Nia Y. Henderson and Jamila Jefferson-Jones, “#LivingWhileBlack: Blackness as Nuisance,” American University Law Review 69, no. 3 (2020): 863–914.
15 See Juliet Hooker, “Black Lives Matter and the Paradoxes of US Black Politics: From Democratic Sacrifice to Democratic Repair,” Political Theory 44, no. 4 (2016): 448–69; Jasson Perez, “Don’t Blame ‘Defund,’”Dissent 68 (2021); David McNally, “Race, Class, the Left, and the US Elections,” Studies in Political Economy 102, no. 1 (2021): 77–91; Eric Bradner, Sarah Mucha, and Arlette Saenz, “Biden: ‘If You Have a Problem Figuring out Whether You’re for Me or Trump, Then You Ain’t Black,’” CNN, May 22, 2020; Tal Alexrod, “Warner Blames Democratic Losses on ‘Defund the Police,’” The Hill, November 14, 2020
16 Wood’s son, Arthur H. Simms, who was also born during enslavement, became a prominent attorney in Chicago and practiced well into his nineties. Likely inspired by his mother’s legal battles, Simms used his law degree to fight for racial justice causes. For example, in the aftermath of the 1919 race riots in Chicago, Simms was part of a legal team that successfully made a self-defense argument for four Black people who were charged with killing a White man during the riots.

References

Abdurahman, J. Khadijah. “Organizing as Joy: An Ocean-Hill Brownsville Story, with Tranae Moran and Fabian Rogers.” Logic Magazine, December 25, 2021. https://logicmag.io/beacons/organizing-as-joy-an-ocean-hill-brownsville-story-with-tranae-moran-and/.

Amnesty International. “Inside the NYPD’s Surveillance Machine.” Accessed May 9, 2022. https://banthescan.amnesty.org/decode/.Anderson, Elijah. “‘The White Space.’” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 1, no. 1 (January 1, 2015): 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649214561306.

Arnett, Chaz. “From Decarceration to E-Carceration.” SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, May 14, 2019. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3388009.

———. “Race, Surveillance, Resistance.” SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2020. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3794000.

Axelrod, Tal. “Warner Blames Democratic Losses on ‘Defund the Police.’” Text. The Hill (blog), November 14, 2020. https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/525983-warner-blames-democratic-losses-on-defund-the-police/.

Baptist, Edward E. The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism. Reprint edition. New York: Basic Books, 2016.

Bhageshpur, Kiran. “Data Is The New Oil — And That’s A Good Thing.” Forbes, November 15, 2019. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2019/11/15/data-is-the-new-oil-and-thats-a-good-thing/.

Bradner, Eric, Sarah Mucha, and Arlette Saenz. “Biden: ‘If You Have a Problem Figuring out Whether You’re for Me or Trump, Then You Ain’t Black.’” CNN, May 22, 2020. https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/22/politics/biden-charlamagne-tha-god-you-aint-black/index.html.

Doty, David. “Data Is Gold For Publishers In A New Media World Order.” Forbes, July 29, 2021. https://www.forbes.com/sites/daviddoty/2021/07/29/data-is-gold-for-publishers-in-a-new-media-world-order/.

Dukes, Kristin, and Sarah Gaither. “Young, Black, and Endangered: Examining the Deaths of Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown Using a Psychological Lens.” In Stereotypes and Stereotyping: Misperceptions, Perspectives and Role of Social Media, 2016.

Durkin, Erin. “New York Tenants Fight as Landlords Embrace Facial Recognition Cameras.” The Guardian, May 30, 2019, sec. Cities. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2019/may/29/new-york-facial-recognition-cameras-apartment-complex.

Farrell, William. “Predominately Black Neighborhoods in D.C. Bear the Brunt of Automated Traffic Enforcement.” D.C. Policy Center, June 28, 2018. https://www.dcpolicycenter.org/publications/predominately-black-neighborhoods-in-d-c-bear-the-brunt-of-automated-traffic-enforcement/.

Finkelman, Paul. “The Kidnapping of John Davis and the Adoption of the Fugitive Slave Law of 1793.” The Journal of Southern History 56, no. 3 (1990): 397–422. https://doi.org/10.2307/2210284.

Goff, Phillip Atiba, Jennifer L. Eberhardt, Melissa J. Williams, and Matthew Christian Jackson. “Not yet Human: Implicit Knowledge, Historical Dehumanization, and Contemporary Consequences.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94, no. 2 (2008): 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.292.

Hannah-Jones, Nikole, and The New York Times Magazine. The 1619 Project: A New Origin Story. Edited by Caitlin Roper, Ilena Silverman, and Jake Silverstein. New York: One World, 2021.

Henderson, Taja-Nia Y., and Jamila Jefferson-Jones. “#LivingWhileBlack: Blackness As Nuisance.” SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, February 10, 2020. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3535960.

Henning, Kristin. The Rage of Innocence: How America Criminalizes Black Youth. New York: Pantheon, 2021.Hinks, Peter P. “Free Blacks and Kidnapping in the Antebellum South.” Historical Journal of Massachusetts 20, no. 1 (1992).

Hooker, Juliet. “Black Lives Matter and the Paradoxes of U.S. Black Politics: From Democratic Sacrifice to Democratic Repair.” Political Theory 44, no. 4 (August 1, 2016): 448–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591716640314.

Hopkins, Emily, and Melissa Sanchez. “Chicago’s ‘Race-Neutral’ Traffic Cameras Ticket Black and Latino Drivers the Most.” ProPublica, January 11, 2022. https://www.propublica.org/article/chicagos-race-neutral-traffic-cameras-ticket-black-and-latino-drivers-the-most.

Jefferson, Brian Jordan. Digitize and Punish: Racial Criminalization in the Digital Age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2020. https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/digitize-and-punish.

Jenkins, Destin, and Justin Leroy, eds. Histories of Racial Capitalism. Columbia University Press, 2021.

Jooste, Yvonne. “Surveillance Capitalism as White World-Making.” Acta Academica 53, no. 1 (2021): 44–67. https://doi.org/10.18820/24150479/aa53i1.3.

Joseph, George. “Racial Disparities in Police ‘Stingray’ Surveillance, Mapped.” Bloomberg.Com, October 18, 2016. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-10-18/u-s-police-cellphone-surveillance-by-stingray-mapped.

Joseph, George, and Debbie Nathan. “Prisons Across the U.S. Are Quietly Building Databases of Incarcerated People’s Voice Prints.” The Intercept, January 30, 2019. https://theintercept.com/2019/01/30/prison-voice-prints-databases-securus/.

Jossen, Sam. “The World’s Most Valuable Resource Is No Longer Oil, But Data.” The Economist. Accessed May 7, 2022. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2017/05/06/the-worlds-most-valuable-resource-is-no-longer-oil-but-data.

Kafer, Gary. “Surveillance Capitalism and Its Racial Discontents by Gary Kafer, p. 1.” Jump Cut: A review of contemporary media. Accessed May 12, 2022. https://ejumpcut.org/archive/jc59.2019/Kafer-Zuboff/index.html.

McDaniel, W. Caleb. Sweet Taste of Liberty: A True Story of Slavery and Restitution in America. Illustrated edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2019.

McNally, David. “Alternatives.” Studies in Political Economy 102, no. 1 (January 2, 2021): 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2021.1901019.

Mirzoeff, Nicholas. “Artificial Vision, White Space and Racial Surveillance Capitalism.” AI & SOCIETY 36, no. 4 (December 1, 2021): 1295–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01095-8.

Nkonde, Mutale. “Automated Anti-Blackness: Facial Recognition in Brooklyn, New York.” Harvard Kennedy School Journal of African American Policy, 2020, 30–36.

Northup, Solomon. 12 Years a Slave. Media tie-in Edition. New York: Graymalkin Media, 2014.

Onwuachi-Willig, Angela. “Policing the Boundaries of Whiteness: The Tragedy of Being ‘Out of Place’ from Emmett Till to Trayvon Martin.” Iowa Law Review 102, no. 3 (2017). https://ilr.law.uiowa.edu/print/volume-102-issue-3/policing-the-boundaries-of-whiteness-the-tragedy-of-being-out-of-place-from-emmett-till-to-trayvon-martin/.

Perez, Jasson. “Don’t Blame ‘Defund.’” Dissent Magazine (blog), Winter 2021. https://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/dont-blame-defund.

Richardson, Rashida, and Amba Kak. “Suspect Development Systems: Databasing Marginality and Enforcing Discipline.” SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, June 1, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3868392.

Shakhidi, Khofiz. “Information Is The New Gold.” Forbes, June 18, 2020. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesfinancecouncil/2020/06/18/information-is-the-new-gold/.

Singh, Arvind. “Is Big Data the New Black Gold?” Wired, February 13, 2013. https://www.wired.com/insights/2013/02/is-big-data-the-new-black-gold/.

Smiley, Calvin John, and David Fakunle. “From ‘Brute’ to ‘Thug:’ The Demonization and Criminalization of Unarmed Black Male Victims in America.” Journal Of Human Behavior In The Social Environment 26, no. 3–4 (2016): 350–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2015.1129256.

Smith, Clint. How the Word Is Passed: A Reckoning with the History of Slavery Across America. Little, Brown, 2021.

Stone, Rebecca, and Kelly M. Socia. “Boy With Toy or Black Male With Gun: An Analysis of Online News Articles Covering the Shooting of Tamir Rice.” Race and Justice 9, no. 3 (July 1, 2019): 330–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368716689594.

Todd, Gracie. “Police Cameras Disproportionately Surveil Nonwhite Areas of DC and Baltimore, CNS Finds.” CNS Maryland (blog), November 19, 2020. https://cnsmaryland.org/2020/11/19/police-cameras-disproportionately-surveil-nonwhite-areas-of-dc-and-baltimore-cns-finds/.

Toonders, Joris. “Data Is the New Oil of the Digital Economy.” Wired, July 23, 2014. https://www.wired.com/insights/2014/07/data-new-oil-digital-economy/.

Wilson, Carol. Freedom at Risk: The Kidnapping of Free Blacks in America, 1780-1865. 1st edition. Lexington, Ky: The University Press of Kentucky, 1994.

Zuboff, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. 1st edition. New York: PublicAffairs, 2019.

Our Network

Tagged In